Back to Chennai

Madras High Court denies bail to two accused in Jana Nayagan film leak

Madras High Court denies bail to two accused in Jana Nayagan film leak

On Thursday, July 2, 2026, the Madras High Court refused to grant bail to two men accused of leaking the unreleased movie 'Jana Nayagan', which stars Chief Minister C. Joseph Vijay. Justice C. Kumarappan dismissed the bail petitions of S. Rajini and Jayaprakash at the high court in Madras after the prosecution revealed that over 1.2 crore people had already watched the uncertified film online.

The prosecution opposed the bail petitions by detailing how the movie was stolen and distributed. The court heard that the prime accused, a freelance film editor who is also the brother of the petitioner S. Rajini, allegedly stole disjointed movie clips on a hard drive from an edit suite.

According to the government counsel, the prime accused and his two brothers then clubbed the separate clips into a single, cohesive movie file. They uploaded this compiled version to Google Drive, from where it quickly spread to piracy platforms such as Tamil Rockers and other websites. This widespread digital piracy resulted in a whopping 1.2 crore people viewing the film before it could be certified by the Central Board of Film Certification (CBFC) or released officially.

In response to the massive leak, the film’s producers, KVN Productions, filed a civil suit in the Madras High Court. The producers obtained an interim injunction order that restrained all Internet Service Providers across India from permitting their platforms to be used for the unauthorized exhibition of the film.

The government counsel argued that the continued incarceration of the petitioners was essential for the ongoing investigation. S. Rajini, the fourth accused, was apprehended in April, while Jayaprakash, the 11th accused, was arrested in June. Meanwhile, two other accused individuals involved in the case remain absconding. The prosecution stated that arresting these fleeing suspects is crucial to unearthing the financial transactions that drove the crime.

Furthermore, the prosecution voiced fears that S. Rajini and Jayaprakash might tamper with evidence and witnesses if they were released on bail. The court was informed that the police have only filed a preliminary charge sheet before the trial court so far, and the investigation must be completed in full before a final charge sheet can be submitted.

Share